In this lecture, many scientists argue that the evidence in the reading cannot prove that dinosaurs are endotherms according to the following reasons.
First of all, Polar Regions where the dinosaur fossils are found were much warmer in the past than today, which enables the species to live there like dinosaurs. The temperature is not such cool as it is today, so many dinosaurs could even migrate to warmer places in Polar Regions.
In addition,the evidence that endothermic animals have their legs underneath their body can also be reputed because not all dinosaurs have their legs underneath their body.The legs at the body’ side are to support their body for growing large size, such as crocodiles, so there is no need to have their legs under their body to run for efficiency. Therefore, the evidence of legs and movements do not prove that dinosaurs are endotherms.
Last but not least, dinosaurs do not only have Haversian canals but also another part that keep their body growth at a low speed. They do not just keep at a permanent speed. They can grow rapidly at first and then grow slowly, which means that they are not endotherms.
In conclusion, dinosaurs may not be endotherms because the evidence are not enough.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... places in Polar Regions. In addition,the evidence that endothermic animals have ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...s have their legs underneath their body.The legs at the body' side are to supp...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, so, then, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 209.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96172248804 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53892568466 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535885167464 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.8066557951 49.2860985944 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.222222222 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06452816374 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417992958857 0.272083759551 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155981227 0.0996497079465 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662812815497 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198561089246 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565143125645 0.0443174109184 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 63.6247240618 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.