The article states that dinosaurs were endotherms and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that scientists recently confirmed that dinosaurs were not endotherms and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that dinosaur fossils have been discover in Polar Region. So, they have that capability to maintain and active in such cold climates. But, the professor refutes this point by saying that polar region where fossils were found was warmer than today. He also states that even dinosaurs migrated to warmer area to protect from the cold environment.
Second, the article posits that there is a connection between endothrmy and the position and movement of the legs. So, the physical activity such as running is efficient only if their legs are underneath the body. But, the professor states that there is no relation between endothrmy and running to any animals. According to him, mainly legs position is essential to maintain the body weight and the large size.
Third, the reading says that the bones of endotherms like Haversian canals that help the living animal to grow quickly. But, the professor opposes this point by explaining that dinosaurs had some growth rings that indicate not rapidly growing. We also learn that in winter dinosaurs had slow growing rate but for an endotherm animal, it needs a constant body growth in any environment. So, the professor disagree the article and confirms that dinosaurs were not endotherms.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 59, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'discovered'.
Suggestion: discovered
... claims that dinosaur fossils have been discover in Polar Region. So, they have that cap...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2375 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47739432446 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.9198649696 49.2860985944 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.7857142857 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437203141444 0.272083759551 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139032164308 0.0996497079465 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540320655711 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240695550144 0.162205337803 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546323614573 0.0443174109184 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.