The article states that in an organization, the best way to approach a new project is to assemble a group of people into a team and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that this plan to gather people and work as a team will not work so much and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that if company uses a group of people, it will be a wider range of knowledge, expertise, skills and greater resources. But, the professor refutes this point by saying that some people of this group get free ride and take the advantage. He states that after the project is successful in spite of those free riders, if some well-known members of those group are asked about the process of the project, their attitude will be opposite what the article states.
Second, the article posits that taking part in a group process; the project will work and finish quickly. However, the professor says that lot of people means, it needs a lot of time. According to him to take a suitable decision, it needs a lot of meetings, agreements etc. so, it is a long process to achieve a successful project.
Third, the reading says that the individual team member has a better chance to 'shine' and they can contribute their ideas. But the professor opposes this point by explaining that if we follow this kind of process, it will not help the project for better development. We also learn that one or two people will influence in this project, so, if the other members will like to support the project, these one or two men can drop the project and go for further discussion. Even, if other group members will like to deny this project, those one or two men will force them to accept this project, so, at the end, when the project fail, the company will blame the whole members of this project groups. Thus, the professor disagree this article based on those bold reasons.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, thus, well, kind of, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 339.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60766961652 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37013994726 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477876106195 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1072774893 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.571428571 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284706206148 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104804742372 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627590420248 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178350497965 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505228359378 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.