Both the reading passage and the lecture are about dinosaurs. The article claims that dinosaurs were actually endotherms and provides three reasons of support. However, the lecture states many scientist does not agree with dinosaurs were endotherms and refutes each of author's claim.
First, the author states that some dinosaurs fossils have been founded in Polar Regions this proves the idea that dinosaurs were endotherms. The professor refutes this point. She claims, this does not prove the argument that dinosaurs were endotherms because while dinosaurs on earth, polar regions much warmer than today. And dinosaurs migrated to polar regions because of the warmer climate of these regions.
Second, the article claims that leg position and the movement of dinosaurs greatly suggest the idea that dinosaurs were endotherm species. On the other hand the professor casts doubt onto this claim by stating leg position and the movement does not necessary mean the dinosaurs were endotherms. Because of these features dinosaurs had ability to run fast and support more weight.
Third, the reading passage states that bone structure of dinosaurs one of the feature of endothermy. Conversely, the lecturer states there is a fact that dinosaurs had Haversian canals. However, dinosaurs also had growth ring. That is why dinosaurs had growth pattern. And that pattern is only found in species which are not endotherms.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun scientist seems to be countable; consider using: 'many scientists'.
Suggestion: many scientists
...of support. However, the lecture states many scientist does not agree with dinosaurs were endo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, conversely, first, however, second, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41441441441 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41911603539 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522522522523 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1320272354 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1333333333 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394786495423 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148624036165 0.0996497079465 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078780500614 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256223385049 0.162205337803 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037599044634 0.0443174109184 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.