Both the reading passage and the lecture are about monumental Dutch painter Rembrandt. The passage states there are some clues about the paintings support the idea that some works of him actually not painted by Rembrandt and gives three reasons of support. However, the professor claims whole paintings belongs to only Rembrandt and refutes each of author's reasons.
First, the passage claims that one of his paintings there is an inconsistency and this problem support the idea that it could not be painted by Rembrandt. On the other hand, the professor casts doubt on this claim by stating color pigments in this painting proves that in order to increase the price of painting some parts of it added 100 years later.
Second, the writer states that Rembrandt was proficient to use light and shadow on this paintings, nevertheless, in particular part of his works these elements do not fit at the same time. The professor refutes this point. He states that some parts of this paint is removed. In original painting simple color used in the human face and this color reflect the light and eliminate the face. What's more, as we expected, some light shift realistically.
Third, the author claims that, Rembrandt often uses wood panels for his painting. However, analyzing of the backside of the work shows that it was used different panel which includes few parts of wood glued at the same time.Contrary to this claim, the professor argues that in order to paint make valuable few parts of wood glued together. Original panel of his painting uses wood panels as Rembrandt uses. Furthermore, scientists analyzing the woods, and prove that it belongs to same tree.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s proficient to use light and shadow on this paintings, nevertheless, in particular ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...flect the light and eliminate the face. Whats more, as we expected, some light shift ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Contrary
...ew parts of wood glued at the same time.Contrary to this claim, the professor argues tha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ists analyzing the woods, and prove that it belongs to same tree.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98924731183 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48161234181 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508960573477 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 408.6 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.078991619 49.2860985944 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4285714286 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4227816937 0.272083759551 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159847277218 0.0996497079465 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100282243219 0.0662205650399 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278705009026 0.162205337803 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220385094027 0.0443174109184 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.