The reading and the speaker discuss dinosaurs were endotherms from different perspectives. The author of the reading believes that dinosaurs could maintain an internal temperature and gives three reasons to support his idea. However, the speaker casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He says that none of those notions are convincing.
First of all, the author of the reading points out that people have found the fossils of dinosaurs in Polar Regions, where only endotherm animals could live. This point is challenged by the speaker. He restates the fact that in the past the weather in polar locations was much warmer than today. Moreover, like other animals during winter dinosaurs could migrate to the warmer places to live or they could hibernate as well.
Secondly, the author of the reading contends that the legs of the dinosaurs were located under their bodies, which indicate that they were endotherms. The speaker rebuts this argument by saying that the legs of the dinosaurs were positioned under their bodies in order to support their giant bodies.
Finally, the author of the reading states that the bones of dinosaurs contain structures called Haversian canals, which allow the dinosaurs to grow quickly and it is an important evidence to demonstrate that dinosaurs were endotherms. The speaker, on the other hand, opposes this point by speaking that besides the Haversian canals, the bones structure of dinosaurs also contain growth rings, which enabled dinosaurs to grow rapidly. The growth rings in dinosaurs prove that during the winter dinosaurs stopped increasing their size. Meanwhile, endotherm animals can develop their shape during cold weather as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...than today. Moreover, like other animals during winter dinosaurs could migrate to...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27037037037 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44445847358 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4158216262 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.642857143 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4296095067 0.272083759551 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143358936408 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948801130396 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253831629289 0.162205337803 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696835945619 0.0443174109184 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.