The reading passage suggests that the dinosaurs are endotherms because of the places which the fossils found, the leg position and the bone structure of the dinosaurs. However, the lecturer cast doubt on the each of the author's idea.
First and foremost, the reading states that the most fossils found from the Polar regions which are the place suitable to live only for the animals that can keep its body temperature constant despite the outer temperature. On the other hand, the lecturer said that the Polar regions were much warmer before which is appropriate for non-endotherms to live.
Secondly, the article indicates the leg position of the dinosaur places underneath its body which is the same as the modern endotherms that sustain them when running. In contrast, the lecturer argued the position of the leg is not supposed to encourage running, it needed to support the weight of the dinosaur.
Finally, the passage suggests that the dinosaurs have a Haversian canal which is one of the indicators that decide the animal is endotherm or not. The professor made a counterclaim to that point by explaining that the dinosaur also includes a growth rings which limit the growth of dinosaur during the cold weather. According to him, this is not the characteristic of endotherms.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... lecturer cast doubt on the each of the authors idea. First and foremost, the readi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07042253521 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6757103804 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553990610329 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7958622105 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397256145842 0.272083759551 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153719012978 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806815971735 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227779278053 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398248014383 0.0443174109184 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.