In this set of material the reading discusses about the characteristics that prove the fact that dinosaurs were endotherm, conversely with listening. The listening supports the fact that dinosaurs were not endotherm creatures.
Firstly is said in the reading, the dinosaurs were endotherm because they were found in Polar Regions, therefore those animals had a way to control their own temperature. Will be impossible to survive in this environment without endothermic capacity. In contrast to the belief of the reading, the listening argue the contrary. It explains that the animals could have migrated from the polar region or maybe the polar region was warmer than years ago.
Secondly, meanwhile the reading sustains the fact that legs under the body is an endothermic characteristic as the dinosaurs, hence, they were endothermic creatures. But, in spite of this fact, the listening refutes this theory. The listening explain, Legs under the body helped to those animals to support their high weight and large size, thus, does not mean they could be endotherm.
Thirdly, is mentioned in the reading the Harvesian canals, and only creatures with endothermic characteristics could have these canals. Nevertheless, the listening speak about the contrary, is possible for no endotherm animals have Harvesian canals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vironment without endothermic capacity. In contrast to the belief of the reading...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'conversely', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'secondly', 'therefore', 'third', 'thirdly', 'thus', 'while', 'in contrast', 'in contrast to', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233766233766 0.261695866417 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.160173160173 0.158904122519 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0735930735931 0.0723426182421 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0606060606061 0.0435111971325 139% => OK
Pronouns: 0.025974025974 0.0277247811725 94% => OK
Prepositions: 0.112554112554 0.128828473217 87% => OK
Participles: 0.030303030303 0.0370669169778 82% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.88869849726 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.021645021645 0.0208969081088 104% => OK
Particles: 0.004329004329 0.00154638098197 280% => OK
Determiners: 0.151515151515 0.128158765124 118% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.017316017316 0.0158828679856 109% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.004329004329 0.0114777025283 38% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1330.0 1645.83664459 81% => OK
No of words: 204.0 271.125827815 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.51960784314 6.08160592843 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 4.04852973271 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.377450980392 0.374372842146 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.343137254902 0.287516216867 119% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.254901960784 0.187439937562 136% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.196078431373 0.113142543107 173% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88869849726 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.539623497131 102% => OK
Word variations: 49.7788402874 53.8517498576 92% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 18.5454545455 21.7502111507 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0193513146 49.3711431718 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.909090909 132.220823453 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 21.7502111507 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.54545454545 0.878197800319 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 52.8591800357 50.5018328374 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.52631578947 1.90840788429 80% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.488230969313 0.549887131256 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.165334110947 0.142949733639 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.117940831343 0.0787303798458 150% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.666872967515 0.631733273073 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.172452632535 0.139662658121 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.242410647417 0.266732575781 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081803694191 0.103435571967 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.433313004501 0.414875509568 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0769009830868 0.0530846634433 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.360550728664 0.40443939384 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342076719549 0.0528353158467 65% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.