The reading states that the buildings of the settlements of Chaco Canyon were used for some purposes and provides three reasons of supports. The professor, however, explains that they were not used for those purposes and refutes each of author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that these structures were residential. The professor refutes this point by saying that scientest made some doubts on it. He says that if one houndred people live in any of the structure's room, they need many fire palces to cook. But, he mentions that there are a few fire places that would be suitable just for ten families.
Second, the article states that these structure were used to store food supplies. The lecturer, however, explains that their evidences for the idea do not support it. He douabts that if the place was used for storing maize, there is not any evidence of maize on the floor.
Finally, the reading contends that houses were used as ceremonial centers. The professor again explains that the author's evidence for the idea does not support it. He says that there were not only old ceremony materials but also some other material such as sand and stone too. Besides, He adds that the broken pots mentioned by the article could be used by construct workers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun fire seems to be countable; consider using: 'many fires'.
Suggestion: many fires
...n any of the structures room, they need many fire palces to cook. But, he mentions that t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e idea does not support it. He says that there were not only old ceremony materia...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 14.0 30.3222958057 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86511627907 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30197319361 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567441860465 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.1935023522 49.2860985944 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.4615384615 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5384615385 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253649583543 0.272083759551 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958798826341 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448481414597 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163416245548 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026346165597 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.