As far as the sources are concerned both the passage and the lecture discuss "great houses" which is convincing to explain how they were used.
First, the reading passage says that Chaco structures were residental which used by hundred of people that was same of some cities such as Taos, New Mexico while the listening passage says that from ourside it appears like apartment yet from inside many people survived there according to fire places that there were five fire places for each family cooked their cooking.
Second, unlike the speaker Chaco structures were utilized to store food supplies because of grain maize which can serve long-term and great houses size was convenient. The professor rejects this idea.
Third, in contrast to speaker's points of view, the author's point out that houses maked use of as ceremonial centers . Hence there was a close house which called Pueblo Alto had a proof that was a ceremonial houses. And also some Native American cultures saved that they ate festive meals. However, the speaker disagrees with this point of view.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'explaining'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'convince' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: explaining
...;great houses' which is convincing to explain how they were used. First, the readin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... First, the reading passage says that Chaco structures were residental which u...
^^
Line 4, column 116, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ouses maked use of as ceremonial centers . Hence there was a close house which cal...
^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...es maked use of as ceremonial centers . Hence there was a close house which called Pu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, second, so, third, while, in contrast, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 1373.03311258 66% => OK
No of words: 177.0 270.72406181 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09039548023 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28938615761 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.689265536723 0.540411800872 128% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 419.366225166 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 100.092457258 49.2860985944 203% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 112.625 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.375 7.06452816374 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321007990317 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113823720356 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795362541173 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173345314161 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482950268143 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.