As far as the sources are concerned, both the lecture and the passage discuss the alternative source of energy for cars is the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine which composes electricity by using hydrogen. All of them is agree that burning oil is harmful for envirement.
Firstly, the reading passage says that petrol is finite source and nowadays oil can end up. On the other hand hydrogen can not be reduced which can get not only several plants but also natural gas and water. The listening passage, however, says that hydrogen can not benifit easily which is not usuful directly. To gain hydrogen needs to poor liquid for which tecnology is very harsh and to product it the weather should be so so cold and which is not convenient and simple.
Secondly, unlike the speaker, the author states that hydrogen-based fuel cells could manage to the world's pollution problems which is not harmfull such as carbon dioxide. The professor rejects this idea. The professor states that to obtain hydrogen requires so much energy which leads to so much pollution.
Thirdly, in contrast to speaker's point of view, the author points outs that fuel-cell engines will be economic hence people will spend fewer money to get fuel-cell engine than the other. The speaker, however, disagrees with this point of view. The professor goes on to say that the materials will be so costly to acquire the electricity
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en-based fuel-cell engine which composes electricity by using hydrogen. All of th...
^^
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...icity by using hydrogen. All of them is agree that burning oil is harmful for envirem...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can get not only several plants but also natural gas and water. The listening pas...
^^
Line 2, column 426, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: so
...and to product it the weather should be so so cold and which is not convenient and si...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...en-based fuel cells could manage to the worlds pollution problems which is not harmful...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...int of view, the author points outs that fuel-cell engines will be economic hence...
^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: FEWER_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'less money'?
Suggestion: less money
...ill be economic hence people will spend fewer money to get fuel-cell engine than the other...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce people will spend fewer money to get fuel-cell engine than the other. The spe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, in contrast, such as, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1167.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98717948718 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50643484807 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57264957265 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4824706185 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.25 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 7.06452816374 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375946144854 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117845946458 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120382620365 0.0662205650399 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229343757236 0.162205337803 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934951599346 0.0443174109184 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.