As far as the sources are councerned, both the passage and the lecture discuss weither dinosaurs were endotherms or not. endotherms are animals which keep their body temperatures fixed such as human. The reading passage says that dinosaurs were endotherms for signaficant prove, whihe the listening passage says that scientists have problem to prove that dinosaurs were endotherms.
The reading passage argue that polar dinosaurs were living cold areas and it could be possible just for endotherms animals. The professor, however, feels that polar dinosaurs were living warmer climate and it does not prove that dinosaurs were endotherms.
Secondly, unlike the listening passage, the reading passage says that there was relation between endothermy and position and movement of leg. Endothermy lets physical activity, such as running and which was prove that dinosaurs were endotherms. However, the professor feels that dinosaurs had high energ and being large had an adventeges for running.
The last topic was about Haversian canals. Unlike the speaker, the author states that there was related between endothermy and bone structure
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Endotherms
...ther dinosaurs were endotherms or not. endotherms are animals which keep their body tempe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 124, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e possible just for endotherms animals. The professor, however, feels that polar di...
^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'proved', 'proven'.
Suggestion: proved; proven
...activity, such as running and which was prove that dinosaurs were endotherms. However...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, secondly, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 30.3222958057 16% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 1373.03311258 70% => OK
No of words: 173.0 270.72406181 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57225433526 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.552348777 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 145.348785872 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543352601156 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4244266009 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449499182357 0.272083759551 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179878908967 0.0996497079465 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714026227245 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262225395907 0.162205337803 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854112141231 0.0443174109184 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.