As far as the sources concerned, both the passage and the lecture discuss ecologically sustainable forestry practices. One international organization is busy with certificate which can supply wood companies high ecological standards such as recycling materials. Unlike the reading passege, the speaker states that Americans are searching to benefit this certification.
First, the reading passage says that American cosumers have a lot of add which makes them to not trust in advertising claims in general hence all of them is suggesting that every product is new or improved. The listening passage, however, says that consumers in America cares add and they have confidence in it which is useful to the ecocertification label.
Second, in contrast to author's point of view, the speaker points out that American consumers care price but if there is small difference between the expencive and cheap, they choose the quality not price. However, the lecture goes on to say gain the certificate is costly and American consumers tend to keep lower price than get certificatin.
Third, unlike the speaker, the author states that American consumers do not believe that this will devolop out of USA. They belive that American wood business could purchase their products mostly i America. The professor reject this idea. Ecocertification will help to improve foreign compatation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 221, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'rejects'.
Suggestion: rejects
...roducts mostly i America. The professor reject this idea. Ecocertification will help t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, third, in contrast, in general, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1160.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42056074766 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93148238264 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640186915888 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3973340789 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.454545455 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401431879743 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130819940425 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832696956335 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217153749278 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586052804001 0.0443174109184 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.