The reading and the lecture are both about Chaco Canyon building whereas the author of reading states that American Southwest Chaco Canyon is notable for great house used for living large number of people for three main reason, the lecture suggest that the building was not used for living people. The lecture casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
First of all, according to the reading, the building was used for purely residential purposes by many people. However, the lecture disputes this point. He says that it is unsupported the reason made in reading. Moreover, he mention that the building looks like a church from outside and from inside there is no proof as living a many people. For an instance, there is only few fire places in the building as if there were lived a large number of people than there would be large number of fire places.
Secondly, the reading states that Chaco structure were used for storing of food such as maize, grains without spoil for longer period of time. Nevertheless, the lecture refutes this argument. He argues that there is no spill of grains left over the floor as if there was storing of maize and grains some amount of it would have spread in the floor.
Finally, the reading claims that the building was used for ceremonial center. He says that there is enormous mound formed by the old material which has lots of broken polls. On the other hand, the lecture believe that the mounted by the oral material does not prove that it was used for ceremonial purposes. For example, large part of the building is covered by sands and building construction materials. He thinks that those broken polls that were found in building might left from construction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'mentions'.
Suggestion: mentions
...he reason made in reading. Moreover, he mention that the building looks like a church ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e mention that the building looks like a church from outside and from inside ther...
^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... in the building as if there were lived a large number of people than there would be large number...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... maize, grains without spoil for longer period of time. Nevertheless, the lecture refutes this...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79139072848 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26430271724 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490066225166 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3908013599 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4666666667 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306918159312 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943485223912 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08262672802 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194952712158 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421181675048 0.0443174109184 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.