The reading and lecture are both about the genetic modification. The author of reading claims the positive impact of planting genetically modified tress, whereas the lecture defend himself as by projecting certain reasons that cast doubt on the reading.
First of all, the author of reading posit that the genetically modified tree resistant to the adverse disease that normally non-genetic tree are more susceptible. However, the lecture disputes that the genetically tree might resist to one condition as they were modified to sustain in those environments'. He further adds the information by providing example, genetically modified tree are uniform and if they are exposed to new environment for which they are not trained they will likely to wiped out.
Secondly, the author of the reading states that genetically modified tree bring economical advantages as they grow faster than other tree and produce large number of fruits. Nevertheless, the lecture refutes that there is a hidden cost in genetically planted tree. For an instance, farmer had to pay for the seeds to the company and they cannot further plant the seeds that are collected through an existed tree. For planting the new seeds they had to pay to company every time they grew new tree.
Finally, the author of reading says that the genetically modified tree prevent over exploitation. He suggests that the genetically tree helps to improve the condition of deforestation and help to provide shelter for the rare species. On the other hand, the lecture believe that genetically exploited tree grows aggressively and compete with the same environment as does the by the non-genetically plants, He thinks that genetically modified tree absorbs more soils, minerals which eventually hamper the natural growth of non-genetically planted trees.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35664335664 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.841794913 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506993006993 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9326574229 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.500187222728 0.272083759551 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.220241935185 0.0996497079465 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890252715962 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321238346043 0.162205337803 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110598123973 0.0443174109184 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.