The reading and passage both is about the adverse effect of internal-combustion fuel which are creating lots of problem, whereas the author of the reading says that those problem can be reduced by using hydrogen based fuel. But, the lecture casts doubt on the statement given by the author in the reading by providing three defensive reason which proves that hydrogen fuel is not beneficial.
First of all, the author of the reading points out the fact that internal combustion fuel are relies on petroleum, gasoline and diesel which are very rare to find and are in extinction rate. So, he posit that hydrogen fuel will be useful as it can be derived from various natural resources such as natural gas, water which are renewable resources. However, the professor disputes this point. He says that the hydrogen is not as easily found as the author of the reading states. He further adds more information by explaining that hydrogen cannot be directly derived from water. For example, for the use of hydrogen as a fuel it must be in a pure liquid form which is highly artificial and are very difficult to derived which needs very cool temperature of -283 degree celsius.
Secondly, the author of the reading claims that hydrogen fuel is attractive as it solve the pollution problem which helps to reduce the environmental problems as the production of carbon dioxide of combustion-fuel are more dangerous to nature. Nevertheless, the lecture argues that hydrogen fuel will not solve the problem. He also says that producing pure hydrogen need a process of purification which cause coal and oils to burns and cause the pollution.
Finally, according to the author of the reading people will be more likely to use the hydrogen as it costs low than the internal combustion fuel. He also thinks that the hydrogen fuel is more effective than the combustion fuel. On the other hand, the lecture refutes this statement. He believes that manufacture of fuel-cell platinum is rare to find and also expensive. Moreover, he also thinks that without the platinum the hydrogen alone cannot be ale to generate the electricity which helps to runs the car.
In conclusion, the lecture agree that the combustion-fuel are harmful as it cause the pollution but he also disagree that hydrogen fuel will help to eliminate this problem by illustrating three main points.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of problems'.
Suggestion: lots of problems
...rnal-combustion fuel which are creating lots of problem, whereas the author of the reading says...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this problem' or 'those problems'?
Suggestion: this problem; those problems
...eas the author of the reading says that those problem can be reduced by using hydrogen based ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'posits'.
Suggestion: posits
...find and are in extinction rate. So, he posit that hydrogen fuel will be useful as it...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'solves'?
Suggestion: solves
... that hydrogen fuel is attractive as it solve the pollution problem which helps to re...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 498, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'run'.
Suggestion: run
...generate the electricity which helps to runs the car. In conclusion, the lecture ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 77, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...t the combustion-fuel are harmful as it cause the pollution but he also disagree that...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 109, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'disagrees'.
Suggestion: disagrees
...l as it cause the pollution but he also disagree that hydrogen fuel will help to elimina...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.4613686534 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 12.0772626932 190% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 1373.03311258 143% => OK
No of words: 394.0 270.72406181 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98984771574 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72466864356 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44923857868 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 614.7 419.366225166 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5353403232 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.647058824 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1764705882 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58823529412 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391516423364 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148411112591 0.0996497079465 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830364937855 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253599717501 0.162205337803 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032646946254 0.0443174109184 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.