The article and the professor mainly argue about the importance of seeking eco-certification to the wood companies. The article states that the international organization providing the eco-certification to the wood companies for ecological sustainability but the American wood companies not showing interest to obtain certification and provide three reasons to support. However, the professor says that for good reasons the American wood companies are showing interest to obtain certification for their product and he refutes each of the author's opinion.
First, the passage states that the American wood companies do not pay attention to get approve for certification to advertise their products because the United States consumers are not interested in adverts. The professor opposes this point by saying the American communities do not having on the regular advertising agencies but they rely on only independent agencies because of genuine certification.
Second, the articles aver that American wood companies are not certifying their products because of the high expense. The professor contended this point by saying, of course, the consumers from united states prefer cheap products but they also consider the product quality. He explained that the consumer compares between the certified products and prefer the low-cost product. Unlikely, they do not compare the certified product with noncertified wood.
Third, the passage climes that since they are not doing international trade, the American wood companies not certifying their business. However, the professor casts a doubt on this point by saying, even though they are not selling their product on the international market, they should pay attention to compete to the international mark. he illustrated that if the American wood companies do not update certification, the overseas companies start to import their goods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 539, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...heir product and he refutes each of the authors opinion. First, the passage states tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtified product with noncertified wood. Third, the passage climes that since the...
^^^
Line 4, column 339, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...n to compete to the international mark. he illustrated that if the American wood c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69503546099 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05736282296 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45390070922 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9179882964 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.833333333 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.519306353785 0.272083759551 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.226660622857 0.0996497079465 227% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101974283916 0.0662205650399 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.345373896922 0.162205337803 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237212691564 0.0443174109184 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.3589403974 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.8541721854 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.2367328918 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.7273730684 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.