The article and the lecture both are disputed about the consequences of the let it burn policy. The article states that fire damages a lot of wild range plants and trees and provides three reasons to support. However, the professor mentioned that although some time burns disturb the ecosystem they also a natural part of the ecosystem and it improves the colonization of new species and the plants once fire stops.
First, the article avers that yellow stone park fire damages a huge count of park trees and other vegetation. The professor opposes this point by saying it provided the space for the new plants. He explained that some seeds need extreme heat to germinate so fire provides space for new species.
Second, the passage climes that “let it be fire” policy damage the park wildlife because some animals like deer’s escape from the forest and small animals may not escape. The professor contended this point by saying burned forest create the new opportunity for small species. He explained that woodland fire creates habitation to small animals like rabbits and it also supports to protect them from the predators.
Third, the reading posts that this policy impact on tourism and the local economy. The professor cast a doubt on this point by saying the yellow stone fire happened once in 1960 and it is unusual. He illustrated that the tourists are started visiting the park next year after the fire but the other factors like rainfall and drought conditions are considerable factors to limit the visitors.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.015625 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41733445335 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53515625 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9808157244 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 7.06452816374 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295784728629 0.272083759551 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106555622863 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521906628789 0.0662205650399 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177143644975 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289886950046 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.