TPO-19 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

In the twentieth century, technology plays a key role to get updated information for any kind of topic such as education, entertainment and so on. The people are gathering knowledge from different resources to become a well enlighten on that. Even though it is not ideal, some people believe referring different sources to get better information is a good idea and others not. Personally, I am off the convicted that people should get information from different sources to get a better understanding. I feel this way for two reasons which I explain in the following essay.
To begin with, it is better to consider various factors to update knowledge because each resource has unique information. For example, when I was studying high school, biology is my favorite subject so I used to go to the library to study biology books. When I enter into the library, there is a plenty of the resources for science few are available as electronic source and others are in the form of traditional textbooks. Although every source talks about science, each of the resources had a unique style of expression. So, it is always better to obtain information from a variety of resources for better understanding.
Second, it the people gather information from different books would get better knowledge to compare to studying from a single source. I am exploring my personal experience to explain this point. When I was studying my graduation at Findlay University, I did a project on the diabetic topic with four other friends. we all gathered information about the diabetic from the different resources from old to the latest, as a result, the project got selected for the scholarship. On the other hand, some other students conducted the project on the same topic with a single resource. The investigator rejected it because the information is very old. From this example, I can say that information from various sources is important for better knowledge.
In conclusion, the people studied from the single reference get limited information compared to people considered the different source. I recommend people to study the variety of reference to challenge the current competition.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
...ces to become a well enlighted on that. even though it is not ideal, some people bel...
^^^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...sonal experience to explain this point. when I was studying my graduation at Findlay...
^^^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...diabetic topic with four other friends. we all gathered information about the diab...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to challenge the current competition.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, well, for example, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08379888268 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96377007977 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488826815642 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.477161449 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7894736842 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8421052632 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36842105263 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146714721687 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528038931467 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393520231034 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963819440885 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469108861103 0.0645574589148 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.