The article and the professor mainly argue about the purpose of the massive stone building construction. The ar states that the archeologists argued about the construction and no universal agreement and provide three theories to support. However, the professor says that unfortunately none of the arguments about the constructions were convincing and he refutes each of the author's opinions.
First, the passage states since the buildings are similar to the Tao's apartments, the great houses are purely residential and it allows almost 100 families to live. The professor, says that although the exterior of the building sees like Tao's apartments, the interior of the hoses cast a doubt. he explained that, if the building having a hundred families, it must have more fireplaces but not enough fireplace.
Second, the article avers that the giant architecture used for food storage because the grain maize is their main crop. However, the lecture contended this point by saying unsupportive evidence. he explained that there is no maize on the ground and also in the containers.
Third, the passage claims that the presence of old materials and large pot pieces at the building premises seems like it is a ceremonial center. however, the professor casts a doubt on this point by saying unsupportive evidence. He illustrated that since the other construction materials like sand, stones, and cement along with pot pieces look like it is a trash used by construction workers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 296, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...the interior of the hoses cast a doubt. he explained that, if the building having ...
^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
... point by saying unsupportive evidence. he explained that there is no maize on the...
^^
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...s seems like it is a ceremonial center. however, the professor casts a doubt on this po...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a trash used by construction workers.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24050632911 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85283869163 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573839662447 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7393838946 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145506175539 0.272083759551 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518705914724 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346036632425 0.0662205650399 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849968306939 0.162205337803 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202949556419 0.0443174109184 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.