The article state's that a company should make a policy for their employees to work four days a week because it enhances the company profit and provides three reasons to support. However, the professor says that it won't effects business profits and workers and he refutes each of the author's opinions.
First, the passage states that four day work week improve the company profit for hiring new staff without extra pay. However, the professor says that rather than benefit company, it forces the company to spend a lot more on their training and health benefits. He also explained that even though they save money on the worker's wage company needs to spend an additional amount for office space and computers.
Second, the article avers that as a whole country shorter work week declines the unemployment. The professor contended this point by saying it doesn't follow all employ and the professor also mentioned that the hiring is costly. As a result, the company forces their employees to work more to make up the difference. He also mentioned that the company expects the same productivity from the four days and five work employee. What more, an unpleasant work environment.
Third, The passage climes that shorter work days better for workers because they get chances to spend more time with families and other activities. However, the professor alleges that it is more risk for the individual worker. He explained that shorter work days decreases the job quality and stability. he illustrated that it harms their carrier because they lose their jobs during economic recessions. he also mentioned that it passed over the promotion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...essor contended this point by saying it doesnt follow all employ and the professor als...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...to work more to make up the difference. he also mentioned that the company expects...
^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'employee' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'employees'.
Suggestion: employees
...tivity from the four days and five work employee. what more, an unpleasant work environm...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
...m the four days and five work employee. what more, an unpleasant work environment. ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because they' instead.
Suggestion: because they
...at shorter work days better for workers because of they get chance to spend more time with fami...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 306, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ecreases the job quality and stability. he illustrated that it harms their carrier...
^^
Line 4, column 406, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
... their jobs during economic recessions. he also mentioned that it passed over the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, third, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05904059041 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45533070021 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512915129151 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5266417229 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323836572681 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11598889895 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901757496727 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217810186956 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292910388232 0.0443174109184 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.