The article and the lecturer are mainly discussed about the impact of the Buzzers in the society. The article states that the Buzzing is not good for the society and most of the critics like to ban this kind of marketing and they provide three reasons to support. However, the lecturer explained that the reading clime is really misleading and giving the wrong impression on this and he opposed each of the author's opinion.
First, the article states that the consumer should know that the person is paid for this promotion because people expect the truth. The professor opposes this point by saying it is not true. He explains his own experience as a buzzer, he mentioned that people are like to get the real information about the product and no chance of the misleading the public.
Second, the passage claims that if the buyer knows that the person is paid, they might not show much interest to buy the product. The professor contended this point by saying it is not fact. He explored that people ask a lot of questions when he promotes the product such as cost and quality so he doesn't think they could have such a kind of impression.
Third, the reading posts that Buzzing impacts on the social relationship like mistrust and dishonesty on the people. The salesperson cast a doubt on this point by saying is a kind of wrong thinking. He mentioned that if the product is bad the company could not recruit people to sell their product so the genuine product would give a trust and positive opinion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 408, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...sion on this and he opposed each of the authors opinion. First, the article states tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... product such as cost and quality so he doesnt think they could have such a kind of im...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y could have such a kind of impression. Third, the reading posts that Buzzing im...
^^^
Line 4, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould give a trust and positive opinion.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, really, second, so, third, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65789473684 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36804209882 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503759398496 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5926304871 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292089423811 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989647366532 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742958351864 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178985268624 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037980556166 0.0443174109184 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.