The article and the lecture both are mainly discussed about the replacement of the ethanol with gasoline. The article states that replacement is not a good plane and provide three reasons to support. However, the professor explained that it is a good alternative and he refutes each of the author's opinions.
First, the passage avers that the fuel replacement with ethanol does not solve the environmental pollution problem because it releases carbon dioxide as petrol products. The professor opposes this point by saying although it releases carbon dioxide to the environment, the plants absorb those gases from the climate. so it does not add any further harmful gasses to the atmosphere.
Second, the reading climes that the expanded production of the ethanol decreases the food sources for animals because of most of the plant like corn used for fuel production instead of food sources. The professor contended this point by saying it does not impact the food sources. he explained that most of the gases are produced from the cellulose components of the plants and the plants do not use those parts as a food source.
Third, the article climes that currently the ethanol price is less because of the government providing subsidies but overall it would not compete with gasoline in the future. The professor cast a doubt on this point by saying it will be able to challenge the petrol products. He mentioned that once the production is enhanced, the price would go down. Furthermore, in fact, present the government giving rebates in future the experts estimating the ethanol price reduces three times.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 317, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...ts absorb those gases from the climate. so it does not add any further harmful gas...
^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ng it does not impact the food sources. he explained that most of the gases are pr...
^^
Line 4, column 484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the ethanol price reduces three times.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, second, so, third, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07547169811 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60569794899 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505660377358 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2999111691 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.461538462 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348872673461 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104641716275 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870524647702 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187101845803 0.162205337803 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547351531425 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.