The article and the lecture are mainly argued about the distraction of the cane toad and its consequences. The article states that since the cane toad effects the native species they are proposed several ways control their population and provide three reasons to support. However, the professor opposes this point by saying it won't be that easy to control and he mentioned the climes in the reading passage are unsuccessful. He refutes the each of the author's opinions.
First, the article states that build a national fence is a better way to control their entry because they were used the same plane before to control rabbits and other dangerous species in the twentieth century. The professor opposes this point by saying it is not an effective way. She illustrated that the young cane and the eggs are mostly located in the river beds so it is easy to cross along with water flow and no fence can stop their migration.
Second, The article avers that cane toad can be easily controlled by volunteers because it is easy trape and also easy to catch young toads and their eggs. However, the professor contended this point by saying although it might possible with massive volunteers if they are not trained properly, they could destroy the native species because the young cane toads resemble their traditional species.
Third, the passage posits that spreading of disease-causing viruses limits the growth of the toad species. The lecture cast a doubt on this point by saying spraying disease-causing microorganisms causes the horrible consequences. He illustrated that, yet the species are immigrating to the other countries, it carries their disease and impact on their native species. furthermore, he mentioned that those are the origin species for American and it attacked by viruses results in the imbalance of the ecosystem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ads resemble their traditional species. Third, the passage posits that spreading...
^^^^
Line 4, column 369, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...ase and impact on their native species. furthermore, he mentioned that those are the origin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 512, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ults in the imbalance of the ecosystem.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08278145695 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66682130635 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493377483444 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8782047244 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.076923077 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305039163494 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110638413695 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855389120432 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197411117722 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729122051738 0.0443174109184 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.