The article and the passage mainly discussed the protection of the endangered species Torreya. The article states that scientists provide three considerable solutions to protect those species. However, The professor explained that none of the reading climes are satisfactory and she opposes each of the author's opinions.
First, the article avers that reestablish in the same place is the better option because it has a microclimate. The professor explained that since global warming the environmental conditions in that area is becoming dry even though the weather is cold and it is not a suitable location for Torreya.
Second, the passage climes that migrate the tress into the complete new location far away from Florida to north cool weather for the better survival. The professor contended this point by saying black lotus as an example. She mentioned that when the black lotus migrates to the different location it developed as rapidly as it destroyed the other species of that location likely if we migrate those trees it gives the unpredictable outcome.
Third, the article posits that preserve in the research lab for better monitoring. The professor cast a doubt on this point by saying it is a not a good solution. He mentioned that if placed in the research center, it might not resistant to the diseases. On top of that, she mentioned it needs a large and genetic diversity but the labs do not have enough place to preserve a large number of plants.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 375, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...bs do not have enough place to preserve a large number of plants.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01229508197 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70924579272 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545081967213 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8484606343 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.916666667 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182441257468 0.272083759551 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620035174883 0.0996497079465 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484715200899 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107027214534 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453801023493 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.