The article state's that group of employees working on one project having advantages and provide three reasons to support. However, the professor says that a group of people attacking for a single project having a disadvantage like no personal recognization and oppose the each of the reading climes.
First, the passage states that a group of people involved in one project share their knowledge and skill to the group to get a quality result. The professor opposes this point by saying few of the people in the project are not at all contribute to the project. he explained that only limited employes in the group actively share their skill to get project precisely.
Second, the article avers that group work always fast and accurate. the professor contended this point by saying they need many more meetings to get decide the solution. he mentioned that limited people like one or two forming on a project having a conclusion and they don't need the convenience of the whole team members.
Third, the article posits that one who contributed more to the work they feel happy when their project was the success. However, the professor says that the actual contributor really unhappy to get recognization as a whole. he illustrated that the employee of the group convict a mistake it impact on the whole group. in the same way, even though one person works hard to get project success it credits the whole team.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...e not at all contribute to the project. he explained that only limited employes in...
^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...at group work always fast and accurate. the professor contended this point by sayin...
^^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...re meetings to get decide the solution. he mentioned that limited people like one ...
^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... a project having a conclusion and they dont need the convenience of the whole team ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 224, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...nhappy to get recognization as a whole. he illustrated that the employee of the gr...
^^
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'impacts'?
Suggestion: impacts
...loyee of the group convict a mistake it impact on the whole group. in the same way, ev...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 318, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...a mistake it impact on the whole group. in the same way, even though one person wo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, really, second, so, third, on the whole, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88381742739 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52621795838 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50622406639 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9235066247 49.2860985944 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.0833333333 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271699441239 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111003460659 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451163499962 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18441140683 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236302373694 0.0443174109184 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.