In the current emerging trend, the population goes on increasing every day in contrast to the landscape and the scholars estimating that the world population might be double in the next twenty years. Although it is not ideal, the increased population highly impact on the traffic and pollution. Some people believe that car's utilization would be declined in another twenty years. Others disagree. As per as my concerts, I believe in the next twenty years the four-wheel usage might be the decline because of heavy pollution and cost of living.
First, As we all know the pollution is gradually increasing every year because of the more motor-vehicles and it leads to the global warming, a lack of oxygen supply to the society. What more, Government and private organization stated campaigning to encourage the people to use public transport. Since the literacy improving every year communities are started to understand the importance of restricting the personal cars. For example, when I was in the teenage, most of my friends were attracted to buy cars, But now everyone willing to travel on public transport because of the heavy pollution and traffic. In addition to that, recently I studied an article, it states that the sales rate of cars gradually declining every year and the critics hypothesizing that the sales will be further down in the decade. As we can see the impact of the pollution on the world.
Second, In addition to the global warming, the expenses like the daily needs and the revenue taxes would increase progressively. If we have a family, we have to take care of daily needs like schools fees for children's and other living expenses. moreover, even though the more plenty of car varieties are available in the market, most of them are not affordable and the fuel cost also double than before. So, considering all people are not much interest to buy a car. For example, last year my dad was planning to buy a car, however, he didn't because of the cost of the car and its maintenance cost. He said that after all the consideration better to go on public transport compare to buy the personal car. This explains that, in the future, most of the middle-class families are not showing fascinating to buy own car.
In sum, the future generations might like to hold with traditional public transport because of the over pollution and the expenses to save health and wealth
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 298, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...age the people to use public transport. Since the literacy improving every year commu...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 813, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...les will be further down in the decade. As we can see the impact of the pollution ...
^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...or childrens and other living expenses. moreover, even though the more plenty of car var...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... was planning to buy a car, however, he didnt because of the cost of the car and its ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d the expenses to save health and wealth
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, after all, for example, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87254901961 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7211843544 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509803921569 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.485540581 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.444444444 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109917360621 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032637588663 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284138764063 0.0737576698707 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0623876168349 0.150856017488 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240311349862 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.