The article and the lecture both are discussed about the replacement of the ethanol with gasoline. The reading states that ethanol is not a good alternative for patrol products and provide three reasons to support. However, the professor explained that the reading climes are not convincing because it is a good alternative.
First, the article states that ethanol could not prevent environmental problem because it also releases the carbon dioxide. The professor says that it does not any global warming because it releases from the plant products. He illustrated that most of the ethanol extracted from the plants like corn and the carbon dioxide is the source for their photosynthesis and no chance of global warming.
Second, the passage climes that increased ethanol production natively impact on plant growth and its impact on the animals for food. The professor contended this point by saying it does not diminish the food sources. He illustrated that the fuel is extracted from the cellulose part of the plant compound and it is not suitable for food so it does not impact.
Third, the reading posits that the price of the ethanol never competes with the gasoline, currently, the price is the same because it is subsiding by the government. The lecture cast a doubt on this point by saying it will be able to compete with other fuel products. He mentioned that when the production increases the price would go down and the experts suspecting that in future the would be three times lesser than the current price.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee times lesser than the current price.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1269.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97647058824 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57395346646 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494117647059 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.0 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8689567991 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.75 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 7.06452816374 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358116211596 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126030299742 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685383966589 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209748885937 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322859834661 0.0443174109184 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.