The article mainly discusses the Rembrandt painting and the author cast a doubt on one of his painting. they state's that the painting could not be painted by the Rembrandt and provide three reasons to support. However, the professor says that it is true the examiners thoroughly evaluate the art and concluded that that painting was surely painted by him and she refutes each of the author's opinions.
First The article states that the painting style was inconsistent. The professors say that the painting was repainted. he explained to enhance the value of the paint Rembrandt added additional features like the luxurious coat to the female servant lady.
Second, the article avers that the Rembrandt was a master of light and shadow painting. but, in this painting, the light did not reflect from the down. The professor contended this point by saying the added color hid the illuminating light. he explained that the original painting of the women was wearing the light color clothes that reflect the light on to the face.
Third, the passage climes that back of the painting revealed that he used the different pieces of wood panel. because all his art is in the single wood piece. However, the professor casts a doubt on this point by saying adding wood pieces for the grander to the painting. he illustrated that the wood used before and the for the extension are from the same tree.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...or cast a doubt on one of his painting. they states that the painting could not be p...
^^^^
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'state'
Suggestion: state
...st a doubt on one of his painting. they states that the painting could not be painted ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...rs say that the painting was repainted. he explained to enhance the value of the p...
^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
... a master of light and shadow painting. but, in this painting, the light did not re...
^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...added color hid the illuminating light. he explained that the original painting of...
^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...sed the different pieces of wood panel. because all his art is in the single wood piece...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...sed the different pieces of wood panel. because all his art is in the single wood piece...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 272, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...pieces for the grander to the painting. he illustrated that the wood used before a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85294117647 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43394842511 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491596638655 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 337.5 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0900941805 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 7.06452816374 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436656048477 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157994508383 0.0996497079465 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797629424098 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271797953744 0.162205337803 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744686696546 0.0443174109184 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.