The reading and the lecture both about the biography of chevalier de seingalt, in which he conclude about his life. The author of the reading believes that it is impossible to write a memoir accurately, while the lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. She thinks that it can be obvious that to write a book with out any question, if they exact answer to you by the evidence.
First of all, the author points out that, the book shows it, this man is so rich and had a life style in abroad. It is mentioned that if he was a wealthier person then, why he needs to adopt cash. This point is challenges by lecturer. She says, he sailed his one of the property to get some cash whether this plot is in Switzerland, which shows the evidence that he was an handsome money man.
Secondly, the author of the reading contends that the conversations could not be written as it was going at that time. The articles notes the talking, held between Voltaire and Chevalier, it should not be perfect because it took a lot of evidence that define or point the dialogues to explain as it is.The professor rebuts this argument. She suggests if a person can write down his whole day story in the same night, he may remember all his activities, the way he done. In addition many of his mates and neighbor gives also the prof for this argument.
Finally, the author states that in his biography, there is an explanation about him as the prisoner. The article establishes that he ran off by the roof from the whole of the ceiling, but some criticize that he rewarded one of the jailer to release him. The lecturer, on the other hand, points out that it is already told to every body that after he escape from the jail, there was maintenance of the roof and ceiling. She puts forth the idea that if he bribe someone, so why there was a sustaining process occur in his jail room.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'concludes'.
Suggestion: concludes
...y of chevalier de seingalt, in which he conclude about his life. The author of the readi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
... it can be obvious that to write a book with out any question, if they exact answer to y...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...d, which shows the evidence that he was an handsome money man. Secondly, the au...
^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'note'.
Suggestion: note
...it was going at that time. The articles notes the talking, held between Voltaire and ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...point the dialogues to explain as it is.The professor rebuts this argument. She sug...
^^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...all his activities, the way he done. In addition many of his mates and neighbor gives al...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 351, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'escapes'.
Suggestion: escapes
...lready told to every body that after he escape from the jail, there was maintenance of...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 455, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'bribes'.
Suggestion: bribes
...ing. She puts forth the idea that if he bribe someone, so why there was a sustaining ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, while, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 22.412803532 245% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 347.0 270.72406181 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42363112392 5.08290768461 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38391769119 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538904899135 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0266038349 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1333333333 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294349401028 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897300987847 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476577811857 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164972521939 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030713050928 0.0443174109184 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 12.2367328918 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.