Both the reading and the lecture discuss the wether fuel cell engines or internal combustion engines are better. The passage assures that soon fuel-cell engines will completely replace traditional engines in car manufacturing. However, the lecturer warns that the passage's view is too optimistic and presents arguments that cast doubt on the claims made by the article.
First, the Readings presents the argument that combustion engines rely on Petroleum-base fuels, which are not renewable and will eventually deplete from earth. Moreover, the article mentions that Fuel-cell engines use hydrogen, which is presented even in water and is highly renewable. Meanwhile, the lecturer states that even if hydrogen is very common in various substances, it has to be in a pure presentation in order to be used as fuel. Besides that, the hydrogen must be kept at a very low temperature, all this process is very expensive and makes hydrogen fuel inaccessible.
Second, the author of the passage posits that the by-products of Petroleum-base fuels are very environment-polluting, this poses an environmental problem that would be solved with Fuel-cells engines. The professor in the lecture rebuts this argument, he says that creating hydrogen in a usable state takes too much energy that would come from burning coal or petroleum. Thus, even if the engines do not contaminate, creating the fuel will, defeating the purpose of the engine.
Finally, The article claims that soon the price of the fuel-cell engine will be economically competitive. The author elaborates on this by explaining that this type of engine is twice as efficient as a traditional one, so the consumer will expend only the half on fuel. The professor challenges this claim. He explains that even if this engine is much more fuel-saving, it is made of very expensive components, like platinum. furthermore, it is mentioned that efforts to make cheaper engines without said component have failed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 426, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...ry expensive components, like platinum. furthermore, it is mentioned that efforts to make c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, thus, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 312.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29166666667 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0370801117 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548076923077 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1642600118 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.066666667 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.500957868666 0.272083759551 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183714212674 0.0996497079465 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117463269008 0.0662205650399 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.324525045656 0.162205337803 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232990473731 0.0443174109184 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.