TPO-1-integrated writing
The reading states that decreasing working days of an employee would be something beneficial for companies and offer three reasons of support. However, the speaker refutes the author's explanation and he adds that four working days policy is not effective in a way reading said and offer three counter claims.
First, the reading points out that the decrease in the number of days will increase the number of jobs and this will be helpful for unemployment. The lecturer, however takes this view that decreasing working days to four days will increase company's cost; since, hiring more employee will increase the cost of training and medical issues; in addition, company's needs to provide more space for the new employee they hire, consequently this will need more budget.
Second, the article brings up this view that decreasing working days increase company's profit, since employees will have less error and also will be more alert. In contrast, the professor disputes this point due to the fact that four working days is equal to five days and no additional benefit it will be present.
Third, the passage sheds light on this point that this decrease will improve employee's life. The lecturer casts doubt on this point due to the fact that increase in the amount of free time will increase the risk that employee lose their job and this will decrease the quality of their life. He mentions that if the economy is not in good shape, employees with four working days are more likely to lose their job, because companies have less interest on them.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
in addition, company's needs to provide more space
in addition, companies need to provide more space
decreasing working days increase company's profit
decreasing working days increases company's profit
will increase the risk that employee lose their job
will increase the risk that employees lose their jobs
flaws:
Don't repeat words, phrases and sentences: 'decrease' is repeated six times.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 20 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 12
No. of Words: 262 250
No. of Characters: 1264 1200
No. of Different Words: 129 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.023 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.824 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.258 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 82 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 68 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 41 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29.111 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.255 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.443 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.709 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.199 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Why there is difference
Why is there the difference between your score and the e-grader's score?
Because the e-grader can't
Because the e-grader can't understand the essay topic: 'TPO-1-integrated writing', you may put it like:
TPO 01 integrated writing or
TPO-01 integrated writing
then e-grader will understand them
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...pport. However, the speaker refutes the authors explanation and he adds that four worki...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...planation and he adds that four working days policy is not effective in a way readin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, third, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96183206107 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28587400692 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492366412214 0.540411800872 91% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1335883135 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.444444444 110.228320801 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1111111111 21.698381199 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 11.0289183223 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.