The article states that reducing one work day would benefit both employee and employers by providing three reasons to support. However, The professor explains that reducing work day is not a good idea and refutes each of author's reasons.
First, The reading claims that company can save money. Professor refutes this point by saying that more employee means more expenditure. The company need to train the new employees and provide medical benefit for them. Company need more office space and computers for new employees. So, according to professor, company will be spending more money because of increased employee number.
Second, the article points that four week day work will create more job vacancy and harm about. However, the professor says that hiring is costly for company. The company might just force their employee to work overtime or company might raise expectation from employee. Will make the job unpleasant for employee.
Third, the reading says that employee can spend more time with family and have some private leisure time. However, the professor opposes this point by explaining that company will prefer a employee who work five day a week. Employees who work four day a week is More likely to loose their job when there is a cut down. So, It will decrease their job stability. Also, employees who work five day a week is more likely to get promoted because company will want a manager who stays around for the whole week While he is needed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... by explaining that company will prefer a employee who work five day a week. Empl...
^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... work four day a week is More likely to loose their job when there is a cut down. So,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98780487805 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28825684166 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524390243902 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8349626001 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.6875 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.375 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 7.06452816374 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.07 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.