TPO 10 -1
Although the author supports three main hypotheses for the fact whether predation theory or pollution theory caused population inclination of sea otter in western coast of North America from California to Alaska, the professor finds it completely dubious and brings up some counter reasons to refute them all.
Considering the first point, reading material holds the view that the pollution caused the population decrease due to the existence of several source of pollution along the coastal region including oil rigs and several chemical industries. However, the lecturer finds it unconvincing and insists that predation theory is convincing since no dead whales or otters have been seen on coastal region recently so they must have been eaten by predators.
Furthermore, the author contends that environmental pollution causes all ecosystem to be damaged even a large predator such as orcas. In contrast, the professor asserts that declining otter population is the result of human hunting and it is nothing to do with pollution. Predators such as whales have to change their diets to survive. If otters be hunted by human, the whales have to eat smaller preys.
Eventually, reading passage claims that uneven pattern of otter declination is the result of pollution theory. On the other hand, the speaker believes that predator such as orcas have to hunt in accessible area. They cannot eat preys neither the shallow region nor rocky area. That is why there is an uneven pattern of population in sea ecosystem.
Consequently, this is how the professor casts doubt on the points discussed in the reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Although the author supports three main ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun source seems to be countable; consider using: 'several sources'.
Suggestion: several sources
...lation decrease due to the existence of several source of pollution along the coastal region i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27131782946 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69416371401 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600775193798 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.8666593439 49.2860985944 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336723108257 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112437723292 0.0996497079465 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538376755073 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15955195624 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762434038295 0.0443174109184 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.7273730684 186% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.