tpo
Although a certain conclusion cannot be made, in spite of all undeniable merits of traveling to foreign countries, I firmly concur with the idea that traveling to their own countries is more beneficiary for people. The following paragraphs will substantiate the most outstanding reasons.
First of all, one should take into account this significant fact that people can familiarize with different cultures and rituals in their own countries. In addition, there are a plenty of nice sightseeing and striking landscapes in the most of the countries. Hence, people do not require to travel to foreign countries to visit such these places. To illustrate, one needs only to refer to high potential of tourism in their own countries. To demonstrate, most of the authorities all over the world contend that the majority of foreign trips are for causes which can be met in passengers’ countries. So they established an experimental program worldwide to estimate the awareness of people about tourism attractions in their own countries. The results are surprising: over 90 percent of passengers who go to foreign countries frequently are not aware of tourism attraction even in their own proximities.
In approaching this issue, apart from the fact mentioned above, one should regard another subtle point meticulously, that traveling inside our countries is definitely is more cost effective and time saving. Indeed, people even with tight budget can take a trip through their own country. Traveling to foreign countries requires an unlimited budget and time. Whereas people’s tough lives do not let them to experience these trips. The modern world offer abundant examples of foreign trips which influence on people’s lives adversely just due to wasting their money and time. The noteworthy refreshingly intelligible statistics, revealed by a recent social research in our country, show that majority of population prefer to save their budget and time by elimination of extra costs like traveling to foreign countries.
Being conscious about traveling issues is vital to everyone to have more pleasant and enjoyable trips. Taking all aforementioned arguments into account leads us to the conclusion that we should contemplate about supplanting traveling in our own countries with foreign ones. Taking trips in our own countries not only familiarizes us with different cultures and spectacular places in our vicinity, but also saves more time and money for passengers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'traveling', 'travelling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: traveling; travelling
...countries. Hence, people do not require to travel to foreign countries to visit such thes...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 650, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent social research'.
Suggestion: recent social research
...ly intelligible statistics, revealed by a recent social research in our country, show that majority of p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, whereas, apart from, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45454545455 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.013248981 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52987012987 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9238818481 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3888888889 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.