tpo 10
The material discusses the two explanations that may cause the sea otters' decline. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this topic, namely there is lots of chemical pollution in places where sea otters were declined. Next, there are decline in other mammals in the same region means that they face the same pollution conditions. Finally, the uneven pattern of otters' declined supports the pollution hypothesis.
Conversely, the listening challenges the points, one specific contradiction is predation is the most cause of sea otters' decline, because if the infection was the reason, people should see dead sea otter; however, there were no dead otters. As a result, consistent with the predators' explanation, given that otters were eaten immediately. In addition to that, orcas hunt whales, but whales disappeared from this area because human hunting, thereby orcas should look for other prey, which were otters and other sea mammals. One final point, the uneven pattern is a better explanation for predation, as orcas are so large, they could not access shallow and rack water, but they could access the Alaskan location; precisely, where sea lions and otter were declined.
In summary, there are discrepancies in the presented information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[3]
Message: Did you mean 'there are lots'?
Suggestion: there are lots
...fic points regarding this topic, namely there is lots of chemical pollution in places where s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'predators'' or 'predator's'?
Suggestion: predators'; predator's
...tters. As a result, consistent with the predators explanation, given that otters were eat...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, while, in addition, in summary, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44700460829 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67115791877 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599078341014 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8046050888 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.2 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4 7.06452816374 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376894281994 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141027963175 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721687342499 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181112166299 0.162205337803 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121480593786 0.0443174109184 274% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.