The author, in the reading, describes environmental pollution as the most probable reason behind the decline of the sea otter population across the Alaskan coastal region. The speaker, in the listening, however contends the authors position, by providing evidence which explains how orca predation is the reason behind the decline in the sea otter population.
First of all, the author, in the reading, states that pollution seemed to be the more likely cause initially because there were known sources of it along the Alaskan coast, such as oil rigs and other sources of industrial chemical pollution, and water samples collected from this area revealed high levels of chemicals that could make such species vulnerable to life-threatening infections. The speaker, in the listening, however, states that ongoing investigation refutes the pollution hypothesis because there had been no dead sea otters washing off the shore as should have been had pollution been the major factor. On the other hand, this evidence is more consistent with the predator hypothesis.
Secondly, the author, in the reading, states that other species in the region, such as sea-lions and seals have also seen a decline in their population, indicating more evidence towards the environmental pollution hypothesis. He further states that only widely occurring predators such as the orca, could have had the same effect but orcas prefer to prey on whales. The speaker, in the listening, however disagrees with the author. She reveals that because of human hunting, whales have almost disappeared from the region, which might have caused the orcas to change their diet based on available resources. Orcas would then be preying on sea otters, sea-lions and seals.
Finally, the author, in the reading, believes that pollution hypothesis could also explain the uneven pattern of otter decline. However, the speaker, in the listening, counters the author, emphasizing that the uneven pattern can be better explained by the predation hypothesis. She goes on to say that orcas cannot access regions of shallow water and hence otter population in these regions would not decline.
To sum up, as is evident from this essay, the author, in the reading, and the speaker, in the listening, hold very different opinions on what caused the decline in sea otter population along the Alaskan coast.
Post date | Users | Rates | Content | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2022-10-29 | Sumilak | 70 | Read full essay | |
2022-01-02 | Pooja dave | 80 | Read full essay | |
2020-09-12 | rohamheidari | 70 | Read full essay | |
2020-07-23 | sumilem0n | 80 | Read full essay | |
2019-01-24 | Marija | 85 | Read full essay |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the c73
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money and jobs to save endangered animal or plant species83
- A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10 in order to ensure a quality product As you know we are working with a first time director whose only previous78
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement66
- TPO 01 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reaso83
No. of Words: 375 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4
better to have 4 paragraphs:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 12
No. of Words: 375 250
No. of Characters: 1926 1200
No. of Different Words: 171 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.401 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.136 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.531 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 152 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 112 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.786 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.846 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.857 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.419 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.63 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.136 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4