TPO 10
Environmental pollution caused the rapid decline in the population of sea otter. The professor, however, refutes the idea, in detail.
Foremost, the reading suggests that the water-samples revealed extreme amount of industrial chemical pollution, which caused the otters' death. The professor, however, assesses the point asserting that predators are the main cause of the otters' death; accordingly, if pollution caused the otter's death, the corpse would have been found in sea shores, which is not true.
According to the reading, other sea mammals' population is also decreasing in the same location, suggesting that pollution affected the ecosystem. In contrast, the professor suggests that the population-decreasing is mainly occurring in smaller ones. According to the professor, predators choose smaller prays; therefore only smaller otters' population is decreasing.
Finally, the author wraps his argument positioning that pollutions along the coast caused the uneven decline in the otter population. In contrast, the professor claims that predators can not access shallow and rocky locations; therefore, the otters' population in those areas is constant.
To sum up, the author and the professor have conflicting ideas about the reason behind the otter's population death, and they would have trouble finding common ground about the issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'otters'' or 'otter's'?
Suggestion: otters'; otter's
...al chemical pollution, which caused the otters death. The professor, however, assesses...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'otters'' or 'otter's'?
Suggestion: otters'; otter's
...hat predators are the main cause of the otters death; accordingly, if pollution caused...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'otters'' or 'otter's'?
Suggestion: otters'; otter's
...h; accordingly, if pollution caused the otters death, the corpse would have been found...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mammals'' or 'mammal's'?
Suggestion: mammals'; mammal's
.... According to the reading, other sea mammals population is also decreasing in the sa...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'otters'' or 'otter's'?
Suggestion: otters'; otter's
...e smaller prays; therefore only smaller otters population is decreasing. Finally, th...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'otters'' or 'otter's'?
Suggestion: otters'; otter's
...low and rocky locations; therefore, the otters population in those areas is constant. ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 92, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'otters'' or 'otter's'?
Suggestion: otters'; otter's
...cting ideas about the reason behind the otters population death, and they would have t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, finally, however, if, so, therefore, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1156.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 199.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80904522613 5.08290768461 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95262801101 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552763819095 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9936165878 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.6 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32085376873 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145145527575 0.0996497079465 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112334314354 0.0662205650399 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184016575877 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597542634535 0.0443174109184 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.2367328918 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.