The passage states that there is problem in reading literature that affect reading in public. The professor refutes this idea and opposes each three reasons.
First, the passage states there is deccrease in literature reading because of non intellectual reasons. The professor opposes with this opinion and beleive there are many high quality books in science, history, and etc. that people can take advantage of them. In addition, these books have high qualities and very creative. So lack of readers in literature does not show lack of people who follow books.
Second, the passage points out the alternative books that citizens use are not efficient and suitable. On the contrary the professor beleive the culture is changed and people are moving to the other type of novels.
Third, the passage informs that there are many outstanding authors and lack of audience can cause the final production to be poor and unqualified. However, the professor speaks about high supports. He beleives modern literature is difficult to understand on the other hand in formal type there are many readers who are looking for reading literature.
For conclusion, the passage provides three reasons for lack of audience in literature books and correlates that to the decrease in overal number of readers. But the speaker provides three reason for opposing those type of reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...high quality books in science, history, and etc. that people can take advantage of them....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, second, so, third, in addition, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 220.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5406570049 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513636363636 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1316329268 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7142857143 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288321459464 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970466172382 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948588161818 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162482030156 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666222922271 0.0443174109184 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.