Personally, I agree that have broad knowledge of many academic subjects is better than to specialize in one specific subject. Because I think have broad knowledge is more useful in our daily life. I have two reasons.
The first reason is that I think have broad knowledge is very important for our personal maturity. Such as through know more various knowledge in different subject, we can learn more about this world. Compare with specialize in one specific subject, have broad knowledge people’s minds will be more richer, they know more and see more, so they can learn more about this various world, not just in one area.
And another reason is that have broad knowledge is benefit for us to make new friends. For example, in social contact , usually the talkative people are more popular, people like to make friends with such people, because they are so much to say, people don’t feel awkward or have nothing to say. People like to near this kind of people and talk to them.
For these reasons, I think have broad knowledge is more better than specialize in one specific subject.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... to specialize in one specific subject. Because I think have broad knowledge is more us...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'richer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: richer
...d knowledge people's minds will be more richer, they know more and see more, so they c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... friends. For example, in social contact , usually the talkative people are more p...
^^
Line 7, column 52, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...easons, I think have broad knowledge is more better than specialize in one specific subject...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, for example, i think, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 52.1666666667 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 8.0752688172 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 1977.66487455 46% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 188.0 407.700716846 46% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8670212766 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 4.48103885553 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39119490028 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 212.727598566 46% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521276595745 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 618.680645161 46% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6017064598 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293640976521 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154584978969 0.076458572812 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157520044943 0.0737576698707 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245875138957 0.150856017488 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131004847185 0.0645574589148 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 86.8835125448 33% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.