The article states that people significantly younger people are reading less literature when compared to earlier people. The article also states three claims and averts that it is degrading the intellectual quality in younger generations. However, the professor opposes the article's position of statement and gives three claims ti disprove the claims made in the article.
First, the article states that reading literature would simulate out intellectual demand. It also extends it claim that since no much of them are reading literature, their intellectual sharpness had declined. Whereas, the professor refutes the claim pointing out that intellectual sharpness need not proliferate only by reading literature. Even by reading science, history and other subjects help to grow our mental sharpness. Professor argues that there are several books that help in simulation of out intellect.
Next, the article states that today's generation is wasting time by watching television and media. It also added in its claim that nowadays people are wasting their time in doing like that. However the professor confutes the article's hold that watching television or listening to a song is not a waste of time. She thinks that movies, songs represent the culture usage. This is because, culture has many forms of expressions. Movies and songs also elucidate us the contemporary concerns.
Third, the article casts its concern on the modern authors and claims that nowadays good authors lacks proper audience. The article also adds that this is due to the poor standards in reading among the people. While, the professor opposes this statement. She argues that the modern literature is very difficult to understand. The professor at first agrees that the readers count has declined with this modern literature and after that questions, would the earlier generation read today's modern literature?.
- Question authority. Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world. 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the bestteachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 50
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: IT_VBZ
Message: Did you mean 'claims'?
...intellectual demand. It also extends it claim that since no much of them are reading ...
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: NOW
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
...nd. It also extends it claim that since no much of them are reading literature, th...
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ir intellectual sharpness had declined. Whereas, the professor refutes the claim pointi...
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...llect. Next, the article states that todays generation is wasting time by watching ...
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
... wasting their time in doing like that. However the professor confutes the articles hol...
Line 7, column 211, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... standards in reading among the people. While, the professor opposes this statement. ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46075085324 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67803936465 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522184300341 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5123458332 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2105263158 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4210526316 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.68421052632 7.06452816374 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271766213218 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870749179231 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775228277416 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165178733052 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750793647627 0.0443174109184 169% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.