TPO 11
Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage.
reading less literature effects reading public
The listening and the reading materials have a debate on why inclination for literature books is declining in compare with the past. The penman puts 3 main hypotheses, which are refuted by the following orator.
First of all, the writer suggests that literature sharpen our minds and without it reading public extremely deteriorates. On the other hand, the speaker views this issue from an opposite angle. According to her, intellectually thinking is not related only to literature. Other scientific matters are intriguing and have a stimulating role in human's thoughts.
The second point offered by the author is that not only what people read is critical but also how they spend their time is important. They devote their time to cheep kind of activities that damages the culture. On the contrary, the professor casts doubt on this assumption by saying that culture is changing through the time and stuffs like movie, music, etc. are a form of a culture.
Last, the reading passage proposes that if the rate of reading decreases, the rate of author's writings will diminish too. Because they lose their motivations for producing master pieces. However, the lecturer holds a different view. She explains that mitigating reading speed is due to author's fault, because they write difficult to understand books.
In all, the ideas mentioned in the speech counter the opinions in the text in that less reading the literature books specially by juvenile does not affect to culture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 17, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by juvenile does not affect to culture.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, kind of, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18595041322 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65290865318 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623966942149 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8281684691 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6666666667 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1333333333 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343157168576 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873477206299 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783886693622 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167008147103 0.162205337803 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028644727451 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.