TPO 12 - Integrated
In this set of materials, the reading passage claims that the subject of a portrait which owned by Austen family is Jane Austen and provides three reasons of support. However, the lecturer finds all the idea doubtful and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First of all, the author of passage states that Austin family confirm the assumption that the girl in the portrait is Jane Austen. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that the portrait published in1882 and Jane Austen died about 70 years before the date, thus Austen family has never seen her directly and they could not identify the portrait as Jane portrait.
Furthermore, it is mentioned in the article that the portrait is analogous to the Cassandra's sketch so we can say that the portrait is belong to Jane. On the contrary, the professor draws attention to the fact that because Austen extended family was very large and Jane had a lot of cousins and descendants who can be resemble to Jane, for example, Mery and Comelian who are her distanced niece were look likes her. So, resemblances between the portrait and the sketch is not convincing reasons.
Finally the reading passage asserts that the portrait's style is related to Ozias Humphrey and he was active at the time in which Jane was teenager so he painted a portrait of Jane. In contrast, the speaker disproves the idea due to the fact that the portrait was painted on the canvas which was sold in London when Jane Austen was 27 years old, because the stamp in the back of canvas indicates that it was sold by William Leg and he started to sold canvas in London when Jane was young, but the girl in the portrait is teenager so Jan Austen was not subjected for the painting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts some evidence to refute them all. First of all, the author of passage stat...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntify the portrait as Jane portrait. Furthermore, it is mentioned in the arti...
^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...etch so we can say that the portrait is belong to Jane. On the contrary, the professor...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: THE_NN_AND_THE_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'are'?
Suggestion: are
...ces between the portrait and the sketch is not convincing reasons. Finally the...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the sketch is not convincing reasons. Finally the reading passage asserts that...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...e sketch is not convincing reasons. Finally the reading passage asserts that the po...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, thus, for example, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 303.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68316831683 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36452467094 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501650165017 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.828130049 49.2860985944 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.666666667 110.228320801 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.6666666667 21.698381199 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.4444444444 7.06452816374 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.512380172106 0.272083759551 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221702261014 0.0996497079465 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992951930629 0.0662205650399 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321067415265 0.162205337803 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477628619751 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 53.8541721854 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.