Both text and lecture are about the name of the portrait of Jane Austen painted by her sister: Cassandra. The author of the reading asserts the Jane Austen is a portrait of the painting. However, the tutor of the lecture opposes what the author wrote about by thinking on portrait of a painting as a different person.
To begin with, the passage considered the fact that Austen’s family gave permission to the painter by recognizing the portrait is Austen. But, the lecture casts doubt what the author says. The lecturer thinks that it is not a valid claim. Because, although the family recognized that, it was around 70 years later after Jane Austen died;therefore no one had seen Jane personally.
Secondly, the author thinks that the portrait looks similar with Austen in Cassandra's sketch even though it’s an adult portrait by having a resembled feature such as eyebrows, nose, mouth and overall shape. The lecturer believes that the painter Cassandra and Austen had large family, so the portrait can be one of the relatives of them.In fact this could be their their relative named May.
Finally, the passage suggests that Austen was teenager when the painting had drawn and the style of painting was active when she was in the same period. The speaker of the listening says that the stamp of the painting was printed when she was older than the picture so that the portrait cannot be her.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is Austen. But, the lecture casts doubt what the author says. The lecturer thin...
^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oubt what the author says. The lecturer thinks that it is not a valid claim. Bec...
^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nks that the portrait looks similar with Austen in Cassandras sketch even though...
^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...looks similar with Austen in Cassandras sketch even though it's an adult po...
^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... even though it's an adult portrait by having a resembled feature such as ey...
^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ait can be one of the relatives of them.In fact this could be their their relative...
^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: their
...relatives of them.In fact this could be their their relative named May. Finally, the pas...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly, the passage suggests that Austen was teenager when the painting had drawn and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90416666667 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4534520748 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1961834171 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.514316082676 0.272083759551 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201477197237 0.0996497079465 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121578799928 0.0662205650399 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310999105846 0.162205337803 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199385150453 0.0443174109184 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.