TPO 12 - Jane Austen Portrait
In the reading passage, the author claims that the professional painting, which is full-length portrait of a teenager girl is the picture() of Jane Austen, who was an illustrious English novelist, by pointing out 3 reasons of support. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and states some evidence to the contrary.
at first, the author argues that the Austen's family allows to utilize this portrait as a depict() attributing to Austen. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that this authorized letter cannot prove whether it is the Austen's image or not since Jane Austen had died at least 70 years before the first people had this declaration(). Indeed, Those individuals even could not have seen her, and subsequently, they could not say() with certainty() that this portrait is Jane Austen.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that the resemblance of the Cassandra's sketch and the portrait can provide further legitimacy to the owner of the picture. On the other hand, the lecturer disputes this point by clarifying that it could be some of her relatives. In fact, Austen had a extend large family including her cousins and other female(s) that they could have had similarities with Jane. Therefore, It is possible that the subject of the portrait was the distance niece of Jane.
Finally, the author asserts that the style of the painting is another proof of its subject since it is traced() back to 1790s, the time that Jane was teenager. The professor, thought, dismisses it by subscribing to the fact that the later research revealed that the painting was depicted on the black canvas, and William Leg sold it in London when Jane Austen was about 27 years old which is much older than the age of the girl in the picture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: At
...states some evidence to the contrary. at first, the author argues that the Auste...
^^
Line 2, column 60, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'utilizing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: utilizing
...r argues that the Austens family allows to utilize this portrait as a depict attributing t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 88, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...mily allows to utilize this portrait as a depict attributing to Austen. Conversely, the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e of her relatives. In fact, Austen had a extend large family including her cousi...
^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e of her relatives. In fact, Austen had a extend large family including her cousins and ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, so, therefore, at least, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87419354839 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60017008969 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.6708152394 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.363636364 110.228320801 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1818181818 21.698381199 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.450314686176 0.272083759551 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164240420314 0.0996497079465 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102368694338 0.0662205650399 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259023138613 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368046282685 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.3589403974 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.