The passage provides various reasons to connect a portrait painting to a famous novelist, whereas the professor in the lecture refutes the assertion by explaining contradictory pieces of evidence.
First of all, the author refers to the point that Austen's descendants have approved of that the painting is portraiting Austen in her adulthood. However, even though the lecturer finds this evidence related loosely connected to the assertion, he takes issue with this statement by saying that the family members confirmed Austin's painting seventy years after her death, and accordingly, they had never seen Austin as a teenager.
Furthermore, the professor challenges the claim in the writing that similarity between the portrait and the amateurish sketch of Austin is a reliable proof for the validity of the theory; according to the professor, Austen's family had been an extensive one, so that might be one of her cousins that resembles Austen's face. In fact, the lecturer alleges that the portrait belongs to a distant niece of her.
Finally, the lecturer agrees up to a point that the painting style is in analogy with the Humphery's style, but he points out that the cloth which is used in the painting demonstrates that the painting is not done during the time that Austen was a teenager. He states that the person who had been selling so cloth in London had begun to sell it years after the time to which the writer suggests the painting belongs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, so, whereas, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1218.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03305785124 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64100992164 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557851239669 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 21.2450331126 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.8387659747 49.2860985944 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.0 110.228320801 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.5714285714 21.698381199 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8571428571 7.06452816374 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325315161852 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148858411289 0.0996497079465 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114266759099 0.0662205650399 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181938512752 0.162205337803 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910672888112 0.0443174109184 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.3589403974 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.0289183223 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.498013245 149% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.