The passage mentions numerous disadvantages of using internal-combustion engine automobiles and suggests that utilizing Fuel-cell engines would alleviate issues associated with the existing engines. The professor in the lecture agrees with the reading about the problems of engines that rely on Petroleum fuel, but she refutes the idea that hydrogen-based fuel cells would optimistically become practical.
Firstly, the reading points out that oil fuel are finite resources, whereas hydrogen is abundantly available in the environment. The lecturer, however, asserts that even though hydrogen is readily available, it is not in an appropriate form to be adopted in the car engines to produce electricity. According to professor, hydrogen must be in the form of liquid which is technologically difficult to maintain it in this artificial state.
Secondly, the professor challenges the passage that hydrogen-based automobiles will not harm the environment by mentioning that producing hydrogen fuel in the manufacture requires a lot of energy for procedures such as the purification, and as a result, providing such energies requires burning coal or oil which would bring about pollution to the environment. So, even though the cars will not pollute, the fuel manufacturer will contaminate the air.
Finally, the lecturer refutes the speculation of the writer that utilizing hydrogen-based automobile would be cost effective. In contrast, she alleges that expensive materials such as platinium is required for manufacturing such engines because the investigations have demonstrated that employing cheaper materials would cause the hydrogen to fail in chemical reactions required for producing electricity and power source of the automobile. Therefore, she claims that the price of these cars would be expensive, and people might not be attracted to them because of financial benefits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, in contrast, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78136200717 5.08290768461 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3041190984 2.5805825403 128% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562724014337 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.4451332706 49.2860985944 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.3 110.228320801 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9 21.698381199 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 7.06452816374 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.3589403974 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.8541721854 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.0289183223 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 12.2367328918 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.42419426049 121% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.7273730684 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.