TPO 12 - Jane Austen Portrait
Actually, both the passage and the lecture comment about a portrait which is known as a picture of Jane Austen who is a renowned novelist and the face and style of her is ambiguous. Although the passage brings three reasons in order to prove the claim that the portrait is related to Jane Austen, the lecturer puts those statement under question. According to the professor expression, none of the reasons are convincing.
First, as the passage illustrated the picture have been painted Jane because the family members have acknowledged. The professor; however, refutes the claim by emphasizing the fact that family members who are questioned, have lived 70 years after the time when Janes dead.
Next, as the passage mentioned both the portrait and Cassandra's sketch- the picture which has been painted by an amateur artist- contain similar shape; hence, the mentioned portrait includes Jane's picture. Nonetheless, the professor dismisses the statement, by adding the thought that Jane family was wide enough that the portrait can be painted from others such as Jane's nieces who was extremely similar to her.
Finally, the passage endorses the Full-length portrait by focussing on other components of that including Ozias Humphery. On the contrary, the lecturer believes the portrait hasn't painted when Jan was teenagers because there at least one evidence that confirms his claim. The leg which can be seen in the photo existed when Jane was 27.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this statement' or 'those statements'?
Suggestion: this statement; those statements
...lated to Jane Austen, the lecturer puts those statement under question. According to the profes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 175, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...ary, the lecturer believes the portrait hasnt painted when Jan was teenagers because ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, hence, however, nonetheless, so, at least, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22553191489 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57466150144 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557446808511 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1746754096 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.8 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361376280898 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130966299004 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620525898594 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201831224524 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489738141378 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.