TPO 13
Both of the provided material is discussing the private collectors interested in buying fossils, and its pros and cons. The article states that this type of business is harmful to scientific society related to fossil experiments. However, the lecture explains that the benefits of the meddling of the private collectors outweigh the disadvantages stated in the passage.
Firstly, the reading states that private collectors remove the fossils from public exposure, which is to take away a source of knowledge. The professor refutes this point by saying the exact opposite. She believes the market that provides the goods for this sale puts the fossils more discernible, not less. These markets try to exhibit as much as fossil they can to the potential buyers can purchase it. Thus, more public exposure is merely satisfied by this mean.
Second, the article claims that by assigning the fossils exclusively to the collectors, the scientist is deprived of examination and, therefore, more discoveries. On the contrary, the professor explains the process of buying the fossils, that it contains an examination process just before handing the relics over to their owners. So, scientists have even more access to the fossils and get to examine each of them. This way, they do not miss out on the tiniest details.
Third, the reading makes a warning about the amount of damage caused by collectors on the fossils. The lecturer advocates the collectors by stating that if it was not for them, not many people were to find more fossils. So, now that they are discovering more fossils, they are providing the scientific community more evidence regarding the past. Nonetheless, the universities or other governmental organizations could designate a limited budget for this task.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re is merely satisfied by this mean. Second, the article claims that by assig...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, nonetheless, regarding, second, so, therefore, third, thus, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26315789474 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77052151655 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575438596491 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5057086333 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.75 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361525971268 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106299263155 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583866429989 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20294151291 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05005370449 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.