tpo 13
The material discusses the consequences of selling dinosaurs' fossils to private ownerships. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this topic, namely by fossils to private collectors public could not have access to see them. Next, scientists could miss out important discoveries. Finally, untrained commercial collectors may destroy essential scientific evidence associated with the fossils.
Conversely, the listening challenges the points one specific contradiction is selling fossils to private collectors gives public great accessibility to see more fossils not less because private commercials find more fossils. In addition to that, by using this approach scientists still could access the fossils given that before putting valuable scientific identification, fossils should be examined first. Consequently, passing to the hands of experts nothing out there will miss out. One final point, many fossils undercovers run by the universities, commercial collectors could discover more fossils, so it is better to find more fossils than leave them completely undiscovered.
In summary, there discrepancies in the presented information.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, finally, first, firstly, if, look, may, regarding, so, still, while, in addition, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 7.30242825607 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 182.0 270.72406181 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.1043956044 5.08290768461 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06473252284 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620879120879 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.7157069416 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.1 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 7.06452816374 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397679766558 0.272083759551 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149327202191 0.0996497079465 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106120951258 0.0662205650399 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196091802686 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151235207978 0.0443174109184 341% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.8541721854 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.1 12.2367328918 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.